The non-tender deadline is today; Nats have nine more decisions due!

Photo by Sol Tucker | TalkNats

The fine people at MLB Trade Rumors make it easy for us to follow the valuations on arbitration-eligible players. As of this moment, the Washington Nationals have only settled with Ildemaro Vargas and have nine more decisions to make by later today.

The talented Matt Swartz who consults for the Washington Nationals modeled the arbitration numbers for every team. His numbers are always close to fair based on the arbitration rules, not on a player’s true value.  It is a glimpse into the ways the system works, and the debate over who should get tendered a contract — and who should not. 

While today is a commitment to make a deal or no-deal with eligible players, the situation is more complicated because once an arb-player agrees to a set dollar amount prior to an arbitration hearing, their salary, per the new CBA, is 100 percent guaranteed. In the past, teams could have second thoughts up until the early part of Spring Training and only be on the hook for 1/6th of the player’s salary. Now it’s the whole contract guaranteed for those particular players like Vargas.

Teams will be trying to lock players up today to 2023 salaries closer to fair market values, and if they non-tender a player(s) they simultaneously become a free agent. The deadline for exchanging figures isn’t until January 13, with arb hearings taking place at various dates in March. You may hear the terms “file and trial” and that was popularized by teams with the firm stance that they treat the arbitration figure exchange date as a hard deadline.  The Nats are not one of those teams, but the Nats like all teams, do not want to go to arb hearings. Teams that are unable to avoid arbitration prior to exchanging salary figures, the understanding is that they will no longer negotiate one-year deals with that player. However, that is not a binding decision, and the Nats have been known to keep negotiating to avoid going to an arbitration hearing.

First off, let’s explain that arbitration rules generally cover players with at least 3-years of MLB service time and not on a long-term contract. These arb-eligible players have a chance to negotiate a set salary for the upcoming season and get paid above the league minimum salary of $720,000. There is also the Super-Two rule for players with less than three years of service time, but the Nats don’t have any of those players this year.

Here is the list of players compiled by Swartz and MLB Trade Rumors on the Washington Nationals:

  1. Luke Voit (4.169 years of service time): $8.2MM (MLBTR estimated salary)
  2. Erick Fedde (4.099): $3.6MM
  3. Victor Robles (4.033): $2.5MM
  4. Lane Thomas (3.014): $2.1MM
  5. Kyle Finnegan (3.000): $2MM
  6. Carl Edwards Jr. (5.169): $1.6MM
  7. Tanner Rainey (3.127): $1.5MM
  8. Ildemaro Vargas (3.007): $1.1MM; Settle for a reported $975,000
  9. Hunter Harvey (3.047): $1MM
  10. Victor Arano (3.022): $1MM

With the player’s minimum salary floor in 2023, it is no longer a big deal to tender a $1.1 million contract to a player who you know will make your team. It is a much tougher decision on a player like Rainey who is recovering from UCL surgery on his pitching elbow and won’t be available for most of the 2023 season.

Easy Arb Decisions

The easy decisions are Thomas, Finnegan, Edwards, and Harvey. They will all get tendered a contract for the 2023 season. Thomas projects as a starter for 2023. For Finnegan, Edwards, and Harvey, they are all key parts of the bullpen. In 2023, that will mark the final year of team-control for Edwards who is due to be a free agent after the 2023 season.

Toss-up Arb Decisions

The toss-up decisions are Arano and Rainey if general manager Mike Rizzo sees a future with them. Keep in mind, that Rizzo can negotiate a lower salary before the arb decision has to be made.

That could affect several players who are on the bubble like Voit and Fedde, and to a lesser extent Robles.

Victor Robles

You can expect the Nats to tender Robles for 2023. Last year, they paid him under the MLBTR figure of $1.7 million and gave him $1.65 million. It was just a $50,000 shave, but it would seem that it was a small message that the Nats were not exactly, happy, with Robles last year.

While he made about two mind-boggling bad mental mistakes a month on the basepaths and/or on defense, it was his August and September defense that was elite, and that is why he will get a contract today. Robles has great natural talent but his mistakes and offensive woes, for the fifth straight year, Robles continued to see his offensive stats plummet — and for the first time he finished a season below a .600 OPS at .584. Robles also ranked the worst on the team in average exit velocity at 84.6 mph, and a very poor 23.8 hard hit percentage that was the fourth lowest in all of MLB.

Some would say it is time to move on from the former top prospect, but that isn’t Rizzo’s M.O.  He has a history of sticking with a player like Robles, and expects better results. If there was any good news, Robles defense went from slightly above average from April-July to elite in August-September. That also gave him a +0.3 WAR to finish the season in what you could call “saved by his defense” which is all that went right for him in 2022.

Expect Rizzo to offer Robles something below that $2.5 million number, and try to get something done today. You wouldn’t think Robles’ agent would risk getting non-tendered and looking for a free agent deal with his stats. Look no further than the wake-up call that Michael A. Taylor got when the Nats cut him loose after the 2020 season. He went from making $3,325,000 in 2020 and signed for a huge pay cut of $1,750,000 with the Royals — and MAT was coming off of a .676 OPS season.

Erick Fedde

Let’s face it, the numbers overall just are not good here with Fedde. You can find some good though, within the bad. In 14-of-his-27 starts in 2022, Fedde gave up two or fewer runs, and put the Nats in a position to win every one of those games. The 2014 first-round draft pick by the Nats has been one of the most frustrating pitchers to watch in a Nats’ uni. He just has never done enough work to become the star that Rizzo thought he drafted out of UNLV eight years ago. But the Nats have to share in some of the blame as his development just has not been good enough.

Part of the problem this season was that Fedde was fighting through shoulder inflammation in his throwing arm and landed on the 15-day IL on July 30. The other issue is that manager Dave Martinez just allowed Fedde to self-destruct on the mound too often in his career. Just this season, Fedde had two starts where he gave up 6 earnies each, an eight-run outing, and even a nine-run outing. Some managers show much quicker hooks if you know what I mean. Not sure how a pitcher is left out there to give up nine runs. So yes, that skewed his poor season where he finished with a 5.81 ERA. Fedde had a 4.34 ERA into the first week of July and was looking like the star of a poor starting rotation. At least with a 4.34 ERA you rank as a No. 3 pitcher on a good starting staff.

Most likely Fedde was pitching hurt for the final three months of the season. Too often we have seen Fedde with that look of the deer in the headlights. He sometimes has no answers because he lacks the confidence in his own repertoire. Amazingly, he had better splits against lefties than righties this year. He seems to concentrate more on the left-handed hitters and loses focus against the righties who hit him for a .313 batting average. That can’t happen. First innings for Fedde always seem to be 20+ pitches.

Bottomline: Do you really want to pay $3.6 million for a long-man in the bullpen which could be where Rizzo thinks Fedde will end up.  Or is Rizzo worried more so that if he cuts Fedde loose that he will go to another team and turn into a really good player like Austin Voth last year.

Luke Voit

When the Nats made the blockbuster trade with the Padres in early August this year, Voit was the veteran player who came back in the trade that sent Juan Soto and Josh Bell to San Diego. He was fun to watch at times as we all dig the long-ball. But there weren’t enough long-balls, and too much failure especially in big spots. He hit just .214 in RISP spots in 2022 — but it was even worse with the Nats at .208.

In the end, Voit was a negative WAR player at -0.3 for the Nats in his two months with the team. His slash was bad overall for a primary hitter at .228/.295/.381 and a .676 OPS and was probably the reason the Yankees were willing to part with him after he dipped below .800 OPS in 2021. The Nats wish he was still near .800 OPS.

The fact that Voit turns 32 before camp opens for Spring Training in February for position players is another factor that the juice might not be worth the squeeze here at $8.2 million. That’s a lot of lemons that would have to be squeezed into lemonade. But who would replace Voit? That’s the only reason the Nats might keep him. Voit made $5.45 million last year, and my guess is Rizzo will try to offer Voit a deal in the $6 to $7 million range.

The Wrap

With these arb projections, the Nats payroll could be closer to $114 million if every player is tendered a contract. For a young team, that seems like a lot of payroll — but consider it is only $78 million without the Stephen Strasburg contract. That is a significant difference.

The team has to weigh free agents who they will target as to who they will keep as well as look internally within their own minor league system for upgrades. At the end of the day, these are the business of baseball moves.


UPDATED: The Washington Nationals did non-tender both Luke Voit and Erick Fedde while extending tenders to the other seven remaining arb-eligible players.


This entry was posted in Analysis. Bookmark the permalink.